Posts Tagged ‘system’

Health Care Reform Vs Health Insurance Reform

February 3rd, 2012

Health Care reform has been a hot item starting prior to the most recent Presidential Election.  The Obama Administration, has now moved Health Care Reform to the forefront of their agenda.  Regardless of your political affiliation, the obvious facts are that costs have continually increased over the last decade.  How should the problem(s) be resolved?

The average person who favors government intervention believes that the reform needed is with Health Insurance.  Be careful not to confuse Health Care Reform with Health Insurance Reform.  The two issues should be completely different, but it seems the Obama Administration has focused their energies in solving the Health Care Issue by focusing on Health Insurance.

While there have been few specific plans for the administration’s reform, many experts believe that the reform will involve a major involvement from the government.  While there are factions in this nation that favor a “Nationalized Health-care System”, there is equal opposition.  Unfortunately, the public divide seems to rest within the “class system”.  A majority of those families and businesses in the upper-middle to upper class oppose a nationalized system, while the lower-middle to lower class favor a Nationalized Plan.

I say to those that favor a Nationalized Plan, be wary of what you wish for!  The problem with the divide actually resides with education and communication.  Too often, those in the lower portion of the class system have been conditioned to believe the Insurance Companies are the big, bad profit mongers that cause your premiums to increase.  Let’s be frank, insurance companies are in business to make money.  However, if you take a look the profit margins within most Health Insurance Carriers, you will see that most are lucky to achieve a 10% profit.

If the problem with our the “System” is not with the Health Insurance Carriers, then where should the blame go?  Unfortunately, there is no one cause for the skyrocketing costs.  Rather, there are multitude of issues that have caused our Health Care System to become the inefficient beast you see today.  There is no one “magic” pill that will fix our system.

If you take a step back and analyze our system as whole, you have to concur that we have the BEST Health Care Services in the world.  If this were not the case, then why would the world’s wealthiest people fly around the world just to have their medical needs taken care in the United States?  The fact is, wealthy people who live in countries with Nationalized Health Care Systems do not trust those Health Care Providers with routine procedures, much less the more complex ones.

So if we can agree that the Health Care Professionals and Facilities are the best in the world, then you should further assume that those individuals providing that care are deserving of whatever money they make.  For my part, I want the guy who is about to open my chest up to perform heart surgery to be paid like a surgeon, and not a garbage man.  So how do we fix our system?

The first thing is to focus on the real problem.  The real problem is with the inefficiencies present in the system, not with the Insurance Industry.  There are cost savings available through the efficiencies that can be made through the use of technology.  By gaining the cost savings within the system itself, Health Care Providers (not the actual Professionals) do not have to charge as much money.  That means the Health Insurance Carriers do not have to pay as much to the Providers.  Guess what!  That means the Health Insurance Carriers do not have to charge as much in premium.  Finally, Joe & Jackie Blow do not have to pay as much for Health Insurance!

Universal Health Care

January 21st, 2012

Universal Health care is a type of government created system in which every citizen of a country is given access to various forms of medical care, even if they don’t have the resources to pay out of pocket. While the citizens may be able to pay for some services out of pocket, much of the money for Universal Health care will come through taxation or insurance. One of the first countries to institute this form of medical care successfully was Germany under Otto Von Bismarck. However, the very first Universal Healthcare program was created in Great Britain.

Some of the other countries which offer Universal Health care include Australia, France, and Italy. Virtually every industrialized nation currently offers some type of Universal Health care except for the United States. While the definition of Universal Health care largely remains the same, the actual structure of this system will vary from one country to another. The system also varies in terms of how much the government is involved. For example, while some nations allow private doctors to offer their services, other countries do not. In the United Kingdon, doctors can choose to offer services which are outside the government system, but Canada has more restrictions on their medical services.

It is important for readers to realize that Universal Health care is a very wide concept. There are a number of ways in which such a system can be utilized. However, the most basic factor in implementation involves the process of allowing all the citizens within a nation to be given access to health care for an affordable rate. Because implementing such a system requires a large amount of money, many governments tax their citizens in order to fund it. The government also decides how the care must be administered, and who is allowed to receive certain types of care. While many countries use taxation to fund this health care system, the patient may still be required to pay a relatively small fee as well.

Because the Universal Health care system has worked so well in many countries, some citizens and politicians in the United States have proposed the introduction of such a system in their own country. American proponents of Universal Health care are quick to point at the rising cost of commercial insurance as evidence that Universal Healthcare would work. Indeed, the cost of health insurance in the United States has become so high that millions of Americans go without health insurance each year, and should they become sick or injured, the cost of medical care could cause them to go into bankruptcy.

Proponents of Universal Health care argue that the utilization of their system would make it more affordable for all Americans to afford healthcare, and millions would not need to go without medical insurance. While the United States does not currently have a Universal Health care system, the government does provide health care for certain segments of the population, such as veterans, the disabled, senior citizens, or those currently serving in the military.

However, it is important to note that Universal Health care is not without its opponents. Those who oppose Univeral Health care often raise questions as to who would pay the most in taxes for such a system. These people argue that depending on the rate of taxes to be charged, many of the same people who currently can’t afford medical insurance would be hard pressed to pay taxes for a Universal Healthcare system. If the taxes are too high, they argue, then the rich would suffer the largest tax burden, but this is the very same group that is the least likely to need Universal Health care in the first place, since they can afford to pay for private health care.

Many high income American citizens are opposed to Universal Healthcare because they feel they will be forced to pay for something they personally don’t need. In addition to paying for their private medical insurance, they would then have to pay taxes for Universal Health care, a service they would not likely use. Opponents of Universal Health care also argue that there are Constitutional issues that come into play. They argue that the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution makes it clear that any powers not granted to the American government in the Constitution must be decided by the states.

Opponents therefore argue that the 10th Amendment demonstrates that only the U.S. states have the power to decide on the issue of Universal Health care, not the Federal government. However, proponents of Universal Health care counter this by saying that the system has worked successfully in other industrialized nations, and if it works there, it can work in the United States as well. One thing that is certain is that there are strong arguments on both sides of the fence, and only time will tell which side is correct. It should also be noted that about 15% of U.S. GDP goes toward health care payments, and this is the highest of any country on the planet.

It should also be noted that over 80% of the U.S. population already has some form of medical care, whether through their job, the government, or a private company. This has led some opponents of Universal Health care to claim that such a system isn’t needed, since only a small percentage of the U.S. population doesn’t have health insurance. However, proponents argue that while 80% of Americans may have some form of coverage, the 20% who don’t is too much. When you consider the fact that 20% of the U.S. population would be around 60 million people who don’t have coverage, it becomes hard to argue with this point.

It should also be noted that the cost of health care in the U.S. is one of the fastest growing phenomenons in recent history. In fact, the rising cost of healthcare is even rising faster than the general rate of inflation. From 2001 through 2007, the rate for family health insurance premiums rose by more than 70%, which is unprecedented. Aside from a government based program for Universal Health care, many cities and states in the U.S. are already in the process of implementing their own Universal Health care plans.